﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Cardiology Medical Billing Blog: Recent Comments</title><link>http://blog.cardiologybilling.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:31:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Cardiology Billing in 2009 faces new challenges</title><link>http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2009/01/11/cardiologybilling2009changes.aspx#comment-2329403</link><dc:creator>Julumaniya</dc:creator><description>Thanks for this. It really helped me out!</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2009/01/11/cardiologybilling2009changes.aspx#comment-2329403</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:51:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Cardiology Billing in 2009 faces new challenges</title><link>http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2009/01/11/cardiologybilling2009changes.aspx#comment-2120958</link><dc:creator>JOYCE</dc:creator><description>there is still no clarification as to what date of service should be used for the remote device checks .( careling,latitude )</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2009/01/11/cardiologybilling2009changes.aspx#comment-2120958</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:14:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Selecting Cardiology Billing Services Using Smart Reference Checks</title><link>http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2008/11/10/cardiologybilling007.aspx#comment-1809734</link><dc:creator>Medical Claim Billing</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the information about Medical Billing Service.I like very much .This is nice collection and references information.&lt;br /&gt;Keep it up.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2008/11/10/cardiologybilling007.aspx#comment-1809734</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:39:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Cardiology Billing and Revenue Cycle Denial Management</title><link>http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2008/10/07/cardiologybilling5.aspx#comment-1786488</link><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>My name is David and I'm having some problems With Medicare on the way I'm billing an echocardiogram, done in the office and read at the hospital.We used 93307,93320,93325 but in 09 they want us to use 93306, when we billed it when the Doctor would read them in the hospital we would put the 26 mod on it.But now we are not getting paid as much as we did before. Any help on this matter would be GREAT.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2008/10/07/cardiologybilling5.aspx#comment-1786488</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:59:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Cardiology Billing and Revenue Cycle Denial Management</title><link>http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2008/10/07/cardiologybilling5.aspx#comment-1484814</link><dc:creator>medical billing software</dc:creator><description>Really good article. I have been following your blog for several months. You have good knowledge on medical billing software. It was also helpful to me to update my site.Please continue the good work. Thank you.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.cardiologybilling.com/2008/10/07/cardiologybilling5.aspx#comment-1484814</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:50:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
